THE €311 BILLION QUESTION: WHY FRAGMENTATION UNDERMINES PREVENTION

The European Union has committed over €311 billion through 2027 across six major nutrition and food policy frameworks, yet implementation remains fragmented and reactive. The Farm to Fork Strategy has withdrawn key initiatives, the Legislative Framework for Sustainable Food Systems remains indefinitely stalled, and member states implement policies with dramatic variation. This fragmentation isn’t just inefficient; it’s dangerous.

When COVID-19 struck, severe food insecurity doubled from 7.1 to 14.4 million Europeans between 2019 and 2021. The Ukraine war pushed food inflation to a historic 19.19% peak by March 2023. Climate-induced heat waves added 0.8 percentage points to consumer food prices within a single year. Each crisis made European food systems more vulnerable to the next, creating a permanent state of emergency that reactive approaches cannot address.

NORDIC MODELS PROVE ANTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE WORKS

While Brussels struggles with coordination, Finland demonstrates what’s possible. Their National Foresight Network under the Prime Minister’s Office produces government futures reports every four years, with parliamentary integration ensuring continuity across electoral cycles. The result? Finland provides free daily meals to 850,000 students, integrated into national curricula as educational tools for nutrition and sustainability: not just food provision but knowledge transmission.

The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023 represent the first major dietary guidelines integrating environmental sustainability with health recommendations. While this integration shows forward-thinking planning, understanding that climate change will affect food production, the recommendations risk becoming prescriptive if applied uniformly without considering economic realities and cultural contexts. Building adaptive capacity into nutritional policy requires not just environmental considerations, but also recognition that sustainable eating patterns must be economically accessible and culturally appropriate for diverse populations, not just those with the means to afford premium “sustainable” options.

The Milan Urban Food Policy Pact, signed by over 200 cities, demonstrates horizontal anticipatory governance with systematic tracking of 37 recommended actions. Cities share knowledge continuously, adapting to emerging challenges without waiting for top-down directives. This distributed resilience model shows how anticipatory governance can function even without perfect central coordination.

THE HIDDEN COST OF REACTIVE NUTRITION POLICY

Disease-related malnutrition alone costs EU economies up to €120 billion annually, nearly equivalent to the entire EU budget. Cardiovascular disease from poor nutrition creates an additional €169 billion burden, with 45% in non-healthcare costs from productivity losses. These aren’t abstract numbers but concrete drains on European competitiveness.

The opportunity cost may be even greater. While global nutrition technology markets expand rapidly, Europe risks becoming a consumer rather than creator of nutrition innovation. Asian and American companies are developing AI-powered personalized nutrition platforms, behavioral technology solutions, and food system digitalization tools while Europe debates sugar taxes and warning labels.

FOUR PATHS TO ANTICIPATORY NUTRITION LEADERSHIP

Rather than prescriptive one-size-fits-all approaches, Europe needs adaptive, evidence-based strategies that respect individual and cultural diversity while building systemic resilience:

1. Personalized Nutrition Infrastructure: Leverage AI and biotechnology to develop precision health technology that could significantly reduce healthcare costs through targeted interventions. This means moving beyond population-level recommendations to individually-adaptive solutions based on genetics, microbiome, and lifestyle factors.

2. Behavioral Innovation Labs: Replace static warning labels with dynamic, context-aware choice architecture. Instead of telling people what not to eat, help them understand their own patterns and make informed decisions. This creates exportable behavioral technology while respecting personal autonomy.

3. Adaptive Governance Networks: Develop real-time policy adjustment mechanisms based on health outcome data with regional customization. Finland’s model shows this works: policies evolve based on evidence, not ideology.

4. Food System Digitalization: Integrate blockchain-based traceability, AI-powered monitoring platforms, and digital twins of regional food systems. This comprehensive approach could substantially improve efficiency while creating new export industries.

EDUCATION AS PREVENTION: THE MISSING FOUNDATION

68.8% of European medical schools require only an average of 23.68 hours of nutrition education, less than a single week of training for professionals who will guide public health for decades. This isn’t just an educational gap; it’s a systemic failure that perpetuates reactive rather than preventive approaches.

The solution isn’t to overload already packed medical curricula, but to foster collaboration between medical doctors, nutritionists, and dietitians while democratizing nutrition education entirely. Nutrition knowledge should be taught in all schools from the earliest years, just as children learn to read and do mathematics. If food is a human right, then knowledge about nourishment should be too. This means teaching not just what to eat, but understanding the complex interplay between nutrition, emotions, culture, and economics.

Finland’s school meal program demonstrates this integration: meals become educational tools for food culture, sustainability, and health literacy. Every child, regardless of socioeconomic background, gains the fundamental knowledge to nourish themselves throughout life. This universal approach prevents the creation of knowledge gaps that later manifest as health disparities.

The EU’s SchoolFood4Change project, a €43 million Horizon 2020 initiative, reaches 2 million citizens across 3,000 schools in 12 countries, but remains disconnected from broader policy frameworks. Integration, not isolation, drives systemic change. When nutrition education becomes as fundamental as literacy and numeracy, we stop treating food knowledge as a privilege and recognize it as the foundation of human dignity and health it truly is.

FROM PROTECTIONISM TO INNOVATION

The current debate over plant-based meat naming reveals deeper tensions. While the European Commission proposes protecting 29 meat-related terms, the real challenge isn’t nomenclature but innovation capacity. Instead of protecting traditional industries through regulation, Europe should lead through innovation.

This means supporting both traditional and alternative protein sectors through research funding, infrastructure development, and market access, not picking winners through regulatory protection. The €215.5 billion agricultural sector and emerging alternative protein industry can coexist and thrive through innovation rather than protectionism.

THE TRANSFORMATION IMPERATIVE

Europe stands at a critical juncture. Cascading crises have exposed fundamental vulnerabilities that reactive approaches cannot address. The Ukraine war alone demonstrated how quickly dependencies can become disasters: Ukraine supplied 52% of EU maize imports, 19% of soft wheat, and 72% of rapeseed imports. When Russia and Belarus restricted fertilizer exports, it affected 75% of countries’ fertilizer consumption from these sources, with gas accounting for up to 90% of nitrogen fertilizer production costs.

The path forward requires:

• Reviving the Legislative Framework for Sustainable Food Systems to ensure policy coherence.
• Establishing dedicated foresight capacity with sustained funding and cross-sectoral integration.
• Building comprehensive early warning systems that integrate health, climate, and agricultural data.
• Creating innovation governance frameworks that balance long-term planning with adaptive capacity.

This isn’t about choosing between economic competitiveness and public health: anticipatory nutrition governance delivers both. The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) has processed over 51,000 notifications since 1979, demonstrating effective cross-border threat identification, yet it functions reactively rather than predictively. Building true anticipatory capacity requires systematic transformation.

The choice is clear: continue reactive approaches that leave Europe perpetually responding to crises, or embrace anticipatory governance that builds the resilient, innovative, and competitive food systems the future demands. With disease-related malnutrition costing €120 billion annually and cardiovascular disease adding another €169 billion burden, the investment required for transformation is substantial, but the cost of inaction, measured in both human suffering and lost economic opportunity, is far greater.

*Dr. Anayanci Masís-Vargas is a neuroscientist, physiologist, and nutritionist, founder of NutriXQ, and advocate for evidence-based nutrition policy.

Read the article Wearables, AI & Precision Nutrition: What the EU Can Learn from the US>>>