From One-Size-Fits-All to Metabolic Flexibility: The Economic Case for Adaptive EU Nutrition PolicyBY ANAYANCI MASIS-VARGAS

Leggi l’articolo in italiano

Europe spends €375 billion annually on diet-related diseases while maintaining dietary guidelines that ignore documented metabolic diversity. When the PREDICT study revealed that humans eating identical meals show 103% variation in fat response and 68% in glucose, it confirmed what clinicians observe daily: one-size-fits-all nutrition policies fundamentally misunderstand human metabolism.

The EU’s Paradox on Individual Prevention

Current EU Dietary Reference Values explicitly state they’re “NOT recommendations for individuals”, yet individual behavior change remains our primary prevention strategy. This paradox explains why Finland, our best performer, achieves only 32% high implementation of nutrition policies, and why no EU country meets WHO targets for obesity or anemia.

The economic case for change is compelling. Models project €605 billion in potential savings by 2050 through optimized prevention, while current approaches waste €90.4 billion annually on ineffective programs. Implementation costs (€100-300 per person for metabolic profiling) pale against €167.5 billion in annual diabetes costs alone.

From Theory to Practice: A Multilevel Approach

International precedents prove feasibility. The Netherlands’ Wheel of Five creates age-specific patterns through mathematical optimization. Nordic guidelines provide ranges acknowledging individual variability. Food4Me demonstrated that even questionnaire-based personalization outperforms generic advice across 1,607 participants in seven EU countries, while the US invests $170 million recognizing precision nutrition as healthcare’s future.

Evidence-based policy demands practical implementation pathways:

  • Level 1 enhances existing guidelines through basic stratification, minimal infrastructure change, and immediate deployment.
  • Level 2 adds accessible biomarkers for deeper personalization.
  • Level 3 reserves genetic approaches for complex cases.

This tiered framework directs intensive resources to high-risk populations while providing digital tools for healthy majorities.

Equity First: Precision Nutrition as a Public Good

The European Health Data Space provides infrastructure. AI achieving 91% dietary interpretation accuracy demonstrates technological readiness. EU4Health’s €4.4 billion and €14 billion in digital health recovery funds await strategic deployment.

Yet equity must anchor implementation. Without universal access through public healthcare and tiered approaches from questionnaires to sophisticated testing, precision nutrition becomes luxury wellness, exacerbating disparities.

The question isn’t whether to integrate metabolic flexibility into EU policy, but how quickly we can implement what science proves necessary. Biology varies predictably. Policy should too.

Read From Crisis to Prevention: Building Anticipatory Nutrition Governance in EU>>>

SEARCH IN OUR NEWS

LATEST NEWS